To refer to this page use:
|Abstract:||In The Antitrust Paradox, Robert Bork viewed most mergers as either competitively neutral or efficiency enhancing. In his view, only mergers creating a dominant firm or monopoly were likely to harm consumers. Bork was especially skeptical of oligopoly concerns resulting from mergers. In this paper, we provide a critique of Bork’s views on merger policy from The Antitrust Paradox. Many of Bork’s recommendations have been implemented over time and have improved merger analysis. Bork’s proposed horizontal merger policy, however, was too permissive. In particular, the empirical record shows that mergers in oligopolistic markets can raise consumer prices.|
|Citation:||Ashenfelter, O, Hosken, D, Weinberg, M. (2014). Did Robert Bork Understate the Competitive Impact of Mergers? Evidence from Consummated Mergers. Journal of Law and Economics, 57 (S3), S67 - S100. doi:10.1086/675862|
|Pages:||S67 - S100|
|Type of Material:||Journal Article|
|Journal/Proceeding Title:||Journal of Law and Economics|
|Version:||Final published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.|
Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.