Skip to main content

Languages for software-defined networks

Author(s): Foster, N; Guha, A; Reitblatt, M; Story, A; Freedman, Michael J.; et al

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1vt28
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFoster, N-
dc.contributor.authorGuha, A-
dc.contributor.authorReitblatt, M-
dc.contributor.authorStory, A-
dc.contributor.authorFreedman, Michael J.-
dc.contributor.authorKatta, NP-
dc.contributor.authorMonsanto, C-
dc.contributor.authorReich, J-
dc.contributor.authorRexford, Jennifer L.-
dc.contributor.authorSchlesinger, C-
dc.contributor.authorWalker, David-
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, R-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-20T15:11:02Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-20T15:11:02Z-
dc.date.issued2013-02-14en_US
dc.identifier.citationFoster, N, Guha, A, Reitblatt, M, Story, A, Freedman, MJ, Katta, NP, Monsanto, C, Reich, J, Rexford, J, Schlesinger, C, Walker, D, Harrison, R. (2013). Languages for software-defined networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51 (128 - 134. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2013.6461197en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1vt28-
dc.description.abstractModern computer networks perform a bewildering array of tasks, from routing and traffic monitoring, to access control and server load balancing. However, managing these networks is unnecessarily complicated and error-prone, due to a heterogeneous mix of devices (e.g., routers, switches, firewalls, and middleboxes) with closed and proprietary configuration interfaces. Softwaredefined networks are poised to change this by offering a clean and open interface between networking devices and the software that controls them. In particular, many commercial switches support the OpenFlow protocol, and a number of campus, data center, and backbone networks have deployed the new technology. However, while SDNs make it possible to program the network, they does not make it easy. Today's OpenFlow controllers offer low-level APIs that mimic the underlying switch hardware. To reach SDNs¿ full potential, we need to identify the right higher-level abstractions for creating (and composing) applications. In the Frenetic project, we are designing simple and intuitive abstractions for programming the three main stages of network management: monitoring network traffic, specifying and composing packet forwarding policies, and updating policies in a consistent way. Overall, these abstractions make it dramatically easier for programmers to write and reason about SDN applications.en_US
dc.format.extent128 - 134en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Communications Magazineen_US
dc.rightsAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.titleLanguages for software-defined networksen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1109/MCOM.2013.6461197-
dc.date.eissued2013en_US
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Languages for software-defined networks.pdf164.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.