To refer to this page use:
|Abstract:||The concept of matrix rigidity was first introduced by Valiant in . Roughly speaking, a matrix is rigid if its rank cannot be reduced significantly by changing a small number of entries. There has been extensive interest in rigid matrices as Valiant showed in  that rigidity can be used to prove arithmetic circuit lower bounds. In a surprising result, Alman and Williams showed that the (real valued) Hadamard matrix, which was conjectured to be rigid, is actually not very rigid. This line of work was extended by  to a family of matrices related to the Hadamard matrix, but over finite fields. In our work, we take another step in this direction and show that for any abelian group G and function f : G → C, the matrix given by Mxy = f(x − y) for x, y ∈ G is not rigid. In particular, we get that complex valued Fourier matrices, circulant matrices, and Toeplitz matrices are all not rigid and cannot be used to carry out Valiant’s approach to proving circuit lower bounds. This complements a recent result of Goldreich and Tal  who showed that Toeplitz matrices are nontrivially rigid (but not enough for Valiant’s method). Our work differs from previous non-rigidity results in that those works considered matrices whose underlying group of symmetries was of the form F n p with p fixed and n tending to infinity, while in the families of matrices we study, the underlying group of symmetries can be any abelian group and, in particular, the cyclic group ZN , which has very different structure. Our results also suggest natural new candidates for rigidity in the form of matrices whose symmetry groups are highly non-abelian. Our proof has four parts. The first extends the results of [1, 3] to generalized Hadamard matrices over the complex numbers via a new proof technique. The second part handles the N × N Fourier matrix when N has a particularly nice factorization that allows us to embed smaller copies of (generalized) Hadamard matrices inside of it. The third part uses results from number theory to bootstrap the non-rigidity for these special values of N and extend to all sufficiently large N. The fourth and final part involves using the non-rigidity of the Fourier matrix to show that the group algebra matrix, given by Mxy = f(x − y) for x, y ∈ G, is not rigid for any function f and abelian group G.|
|Citation:||Dvir, Zeev, and Allen Liu. "Fourier and Circulant Matrices Are Not Rigid." 34th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC) (2019): pp. 17:1-17:23. doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2019.17|
|Pages:||17:1 - 17:23|
|Type of Material:||Conference Article|
|Journal/Proceeding Title:||34th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC)|
|Version:||Final published version. This is an open access article.|
Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.