Skip to main content

Child-Support Laws and Contraceptive Care

Author(s): Irwin, Timothy

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1nk36502
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIrwin, Timothy-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-17T19:14:39Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-17T19:14:39Z-
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1nk36502-
dc.description.abstractThe paper uses a simple theoretical model of potential parents' contraceptive decisions to analyze the effects of different child-support laws on contraceptive care, the probability of accidental pregnancy, and the distribution of welfare. Among other things, the model implies that under noncooperative contraceptive decision making the rules of paternal, maternal, and joint liability are all inefficient, while a combination of a liability rule and a tax is efficient. Under cooperative contraceptive decision making, it shows that the effects of these rules are reversed: the combination of liability rule and tax is inefficient, while the others are all efficient.en_US
dc.format.extent47-59en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Public and International Affairsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 6;-
dc.rightsFinal published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.en_US
dc.titleChild-Support Laws and Contraceptive Careen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Irwin.pdf1.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.