Skip to main content

Scheduling Policies for Federated Learning in Wireless Networks

Author(s): Yang, Howard H; Liu, Zuozhu; Quek, Tony QS; Poor, H Vincent

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1fj29d0x
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYang, Howard H-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Zuozhu-
dc.contributor.authorQuek, Tony QS-
dc.contributor.authorPoor, H Vincent-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T00:59:59Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T00:59:59Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-27en_US
dc.identifier.citationYang, Howard H, Liu, Zuozhu, Quek, Tony QS, Poor, H Vincent. (2020). Scheduling Policies for Federated Learning in Wireless Networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 68 (1), 317 - 333. doi:10.1109/tcomm.2019.2944169en_US
dc.identifier.issn0090-6778-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1fj29d0x-
dc.description.abstractMotivated by the increasing computational capacity of wireless user equipments (UEs), e.g., smart phones, tablets, or vehicles, as well as the increasing concerns about sharing private data, a new machine learning model has emerged, namely federated learning (FL), that allows a decoupling of data acquisition and computation at the central unit. Unlike centralized learning taking place in a data center, FL usually operates in a wireless edge network where the communication medium is resource-constrained and unreliable. Due to limited bandwidth, only a portion of UEs can be scheduled for updates at each iteration. Due to the shared nature of the wireless medium, transmissions are subjected to interference and are not guaranteed. The performance of FL system in such a setting is not well understood. In this paper, an analytical model is developed to characterize the performance of FL in wireless networks. Particularly, tractable expressions are derived for the convergence rate of FL in a wireless setting, accounting for effects from both scheduling schemes and inter-cell interference. Using the developed analysis, the effectiveness of three different scheduling policies, i.e., random scheduling (RS), round robin (RR), and proportional fair (PF), are compared in terms of FL convergence rate. It is shown that running FL with PF outperforms RS and RR if the network is operating under a high signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) threshold, while RR is more preferable when the SINR threshold is low. Moreover, the FL convergence rate decreases rapidly as the SINR threshold increases, thus confirming the importance of compression and quantization of the update parameters. The analysis also reveals a trade-off between the number of scheduled UEs and subchannel bandwidth under a fixed amount of available spectrum.en_US
dc.format.extent317 - 333en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Communicationsen_US
dc.rightsAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.titleScheduling Policies for Federated Learning in Wireless Networksen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1109/tcomm.2019.2944169-
dc.identifier.eissn1558-0857-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1908.06287.pdf607.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.