Skip to main content

From information to exact communication

Author(s): Braverman, Mark; Garg, Ankit; Pankratov, Denis; Weinstein, Omri

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1c542
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBraverman, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorGarg, Ankit-
dc.contributor.authorPankratov, Denis-
dc.contributor.authorWeinstein, Omri-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-08T19:44:57Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-08T19:44:57Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationBraverman, Mark, Ankit Garg, Denis Pankratov, and Omri Weinstein. "From information to exact communication." Proceedings of the forty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing (2013): pp. 151-160. doi:10.1145/2488608.2488628en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://eccc.weizmann.ac.il/report/2012/171/-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1c542-
dc.description.abstractWe develop a new local characterization of the zero-error information complexity function for two-party communication problems, and use it to compute the exact internal and external information complexity of the 2-bit AND function: IC(AND,0) = C∧≅ 1.4923 bits, and ICext(AND,0) = log2 3 ≅ 1.5839 bits. This leads to a tight (upper and lower bound) characterization of the communication complexity of the set intersection problem on subsets of {1,...,n} (the player are required to compute the intersection of their sets), whose randomized communication complexity tends to C∧⋅ n pm o(n) as the error tends to zero. The information-optimal protocol we present has an infinite number of rounds. We show this is necessary by proving that the rate of convergence of the r-round information cost of AND to IC(AND,0)=C∧ behaves like Θ(1/r2), i.e. that the r-round information complexity of AND is C∧+Θ(1/r2). We leverage the tight analysis obtained for the information complexity of AND to calculate and prove the exact communication complexity of the set disjointness function Disjn(X,Y) = - vi=1n AND(xi,yi) with error tending to 0, which turns out to be = CDISJ⋅ n pm o(n), where CDISJ≅ 0.4827. Our rate of convergence results imply that an asymptotically optimal protocol for set disjointness will have to use ω(1) rounds of communication, since every r-round protocol will be sub-optimal by at least Ω(n/r2) bits of communication. We also obtain the tight bound of 2/ln2 k pm o(k) on the communication complexity of disjointness of sets of size ≤ k. An asymptotic bound of Θ(k) was previously shown by Hastad and Wigderson.en_US
dc.format.extent151 - 160en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the forty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computingen_US
dc.rightsAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.titleFrom information to exact communicationen_US
dc.typeConference Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/2488608.2488628-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/conference-proceedingen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
InformationToExactCommunication.pdf1.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.