To refer to this page use:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr19882m39
Abstract: | Most work in Kant’s epistemology focuses on what happens “upstream” from experience, prior to the formation of conscious propositional attitudes. By contrast, this essay focuses on what happens "downstream": the formation of assent (Fuerwahrhalten) in its various modes. The mode of assent that Kant calls "Belief" (Glaube) is the main topic: not only moral Belief but also "pragmatic" and "doctrinal" Belief as well. I argue that Kant’s discussion shows that we should reject standard accounts of the extent to which theoretical reason can provide justified assent about things-in-themselves, in favor of one that is much more liberal. Interpretive benefits are not the only results of the discussion, however. I also hope it will become clear along the way that there is such a thing as Kantian Belief, and that we often have quite a lot of it. |
Publication Date: | Jul-2007 |
Citation: | Chignell, Andrew. "Belief in kant." The Philosophical Review 116, no. 3 (2007): 323-360. |
ISSN: | 0031-8108 |
Pages: | 323 - 360 |
Language: | English |
Type of Material: | Journal Article |
Journal/Proceeding Title: | The Philosophical Review |
Version: | Final published version. This is an open access article. |
Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.