Skip to main content

Low-Latency Millimeter-Wave Communications: Traffic Dispersion or Network Densification?

Author(s): Yang, Guang; Xiao, Ming; Poor, H Vincent

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1416t017
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYang, Guang-
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Ming-
dc.contributor.authorPoor, H Vincent-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-18T03:11:51Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-18T03:11:51Z-
dc.date.issued2018-03-19en_US
dc.identifier.citationYang, Guang, Xiao, Ming, Poor, H Vincent. (2018). Low-Latency Millimeter-Wave Communications: Traffic Dispersion or Network Densification?. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 66 (8), 3526 - 3539. doi:10.1109/tcomm.2018.2817199en_US
dc.identifier.issn0090-6778-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1416t017-
dc.description.abstractLow latency is critical for many applications in wireless communications, e.g., vehicle-to-vehicle, multimedia, and industrial control networks. Meanwhile, for the capability of providing multi-gigabits per second rates, millimeter-wave (mm-wave) communication has attracted substantial research interest recently. This paper investigates two strategies to reduce the communication delay in future wireless networks: traffic dispersion and network densification. A hybrid scheme that combines these two strategies is also considered. The probabilistic delay and effective capacity are used to evaluate performance. For probabilistic delay, the violation probability of delay, i.e., the probability that the delay exceeds a given tolerance level, is characterized in terms of upper bounds, which are derived by applying stochastic network calculus theory. In addition, to characterize the maximum affordable arrival traffic for mm-wave systems, the effective capacity, i.e., the service capability with a given quality-of-service requirement, is studied. The derived bounds on the probabilistic delay and effective capacity are validated through simulations. These numerical results show that, for a given sum power budget, traffic dispersion, network densification, and the hybrid scheme exhibit different potentials to reduce the end-to-end communication delay. For instance, traffic dispersion outperforms network densification when high sum power budget and arrival rate are given, while it could be the worst option, otherwise. Furthermore, it is revealed that, increasing the number of independent paths and/or relay density is always beneficial, while the performance gain is related to the arrival rate and sum power, jointly. Therefore, a proper transmission scheme should be selected to optimize the delay performance, according to the given conditions on arrival traffic and system service capability.en_US
dc.format.extent3526 - 3539en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Communicationsen_US
dc.rightsAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.titleLow-Latency Millimeter-Wave Communications: Traffic Dispersion or Network Densification?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1109/tcomm.2018.2817199-
dc.identifier.eissn1558-0857-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1709.08410.pdf1.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.