To refer to this page use:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1x34mr32
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chignell, Andrew | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-25T14:49:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-25T14:49:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-07 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Chignell, Andrew. "Kant, Real Possibility, and the Threat of Spinoza." Mind 121, no. 483 (2012): 635-675. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0026-4423 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1x34mr32 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In the first part of the paper I reconstruct Kant’s proof of the existence of a ‘most real being’ while also highlighting the theory of modality that motivates Kant’s departure from Leibniz’s version of the proof. I go on to argue that it is precisely this departure that makes the being that falls out of the pre-critical proof look more like Spinoza’s extended natura naturans than an independent, personal creator-God. In the critical period, Kant seems to think that transcendental idealism allows him to avoid this conclusion, but in the last section of the paper I argue that there is still one important version of the Spinozistic threat that remains. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 635 - 675 | en_US |
dc.language | English | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Mind | en_US |
dc.rights | Final published version. This is an open access article. | en_US |
dc.title | Kant, Real Possibility, and the Threat of Spinoza | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | doi:10.1093/mind/fzs079 | - |
pu.type.symplectic | http://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-article | en_US |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
KantRealPossibility.pdf | 202.43 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Download |
Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.