Skip to main content
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1wm13s91
Abstract: Are democracies more transparent than other types of political regimes? Many people believe that the presence of elections alone is not sufficient for a country to be considered democratic and that transparency must be included as part of the definition of political regime. We agree that contestability of elections and transparency of policymaking are analytically distinct concepts. Adopting minimalist approaches to democracy and transparency, we ask a basic question: do electoral politics provide incentives for governments to disseminate data? We thus investigate theoretically the relationship between regime type and the willingness of policy makers to provide credible announcements on policy-relevant variables. And we demonstrate empirically that the availability (or absence) of policy-relevant data is correlated with regime type, even after controlling for GDP per capita, IMF participation, country fixed-effects, and time trends1. Democracies are indeed more transparent. © Copyright Southern Political Science Association 2011.
Publication Date: 1-Oct-2011
Citation: Hollyer, JR, Rosendorff, BP, Vreeland, JR. (2011). Democracy and transparency. Journal of Politics, 73 (4), 1191 - 1205. doi:10.1017/S0022381611000880
DOI: doi:10.1017/S0022381611000880
ISSN: 0022-3816
EISSN: 1468-2508
Pages: 1 - 15
Type of Material: Journal Article
Journal/Proceeding Title: Journal of Politics
Version: Final published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.



Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.