To refer to this page use:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1vx0627v
Abstract: | Does it ever happen that there are things we shouldn’t do and the reasons we shouldn’t do them are moral reasons, yet doing them is not morally wrong? Surprisingly, yes. I argue for a category that has not been recognized by moral theorists: morally permissible moral mistakes. Sometimes (but far from always) a supererogatory action is the thing a person should do; in failing to act, one makes a morally permissible moral mistake. Recognizing the category of morally permissible moral mistakes solves a puzzle about supererogation, expands the universe of possible moral views, and shows some apparently inconsistent moral views to be consistent. |
Publication Date: | Jan-2016 |
Citation: | Harman, Elizabeth. "Morally permissible moral mistakes." Ethics 126, no. 2 (2016): 366-393. |
DOI: | doi:10.1086/683539 |
ISSN: | 0014-1704 |
EISSN: | 1539-297X |
Pages: | 366 - 393 |
Type of Material: | Journal Article |
Journal/Proceeding Title: | Ethics |
Version: | Final published version. This is an open access article. |
Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.