Skip to main content

Engaging a Nuclear India: Punishment, Reward, and the Politics of Non-Proliferation

Author(s): Bruneau, Richard

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1td9n82p
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBruneau, Richard-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-09T13:30:42Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-09T13:30:42Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1td9n82p-
dc.description.abstractThis paper addresses India’s claim that it is a “responsible nuclear power” and assesses recent changes in the international response to India’s nuclear status. It fi nds that despite India’s outsider status with respect to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and various export control regimes, it has maintained a very strong non-proliferation record. The decisions by the United States and Canada in 2005 to renew nuclear cooperation with India have recognized this, but, in so doing, have potentially undermined the legitimacy of the NPT. In reality, however, the primary mechanisms for infl uencing states’ decisions to cross the nuclear threshold lie outside the NPT and can be strength ened through Indian participation. The path set by renewed cooperation with India is an uncertain one, but its pragmatic approach based on compliance behavior is likely a more credible and effective foundation than the illusions of the NPT.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Public and International Affairsen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.en_US
dc.titleEngaging a Nuclear India: Punishment, Reward, and the Politics of Non-Proliferationen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2006-2.pdf151.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.