Skip to main content

Nativity Differences in Mothers' Health Behaviors: A Cross-National and Longitudinal Lens

Author(s): Jackson, Margot; McLanahan, Sara; Kiernan, Kathleen

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1t78z
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Margot-
dc.contributor.authorMcLanahan, Sara-
dc.contributor.authorKiernan, Kathleen-
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-02T00:50:06Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-02T00:50:06Z-
dc.date.issued2012-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationJackson, M., McLanahan, S., Kiernan, K. (2012). Nativity Differences in Mothers' Health Behaviors: A Cross-National and Longitudinal Lens. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 643 (1), 192 - 218. doi:10.1177/0002716212445438en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-7162-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1t78z-
dc.description.abstractThere are striking advantages in birth outcomes and infant health among the children of foreign-born mothers (Hummer et al. 1999; Landale, Oropesa and Gorman 1999). Similarly, the occurrence of infant mortality and low birth weight is significantly lower among foreign-born, Hispanic mothers than would be expected on the basis of their socioeconomic resources (Hummer et al. 1999). This evidence has led to hypotheses about an “immigrant paradox,” complementing evidence of a “Latino mortality paradox” among adults, whereby Latino adults experience lower rates of many diseases than non-Latino whites, as well as higher life expectancy (Abraido-Lanza et al. 1999). Most research on the health behavior of immigrant mothers comes from work in the United States, particularly among Latin-American populations. The benefits of existing research notwithstanding, an examination of one ethnic group or country of origin cannot highlight ethnic stratification in the degree of immigrant families’ advantage. In addition, much existing work uses cross-sectional data and focuses on the period around birth, prohibiting an adequate test of the theory of unhealthy acculturation. In this article we extend existing research by asking 1) whether the advantage in immigrant mothers’ health behavior extends to immigrant mothers in several ethnic groups in the United Kingdom, and 2) whether the advantage persists beyond infancy. Focusing on mothers’ health behaviors, we compare immigrant mothers to their native-born ethnic counterparts as well as to native-born whites, using data from two large, longitudinal birth cohort surveys—the U.S. Fragile Families Study and the U.K. Millennium Cohort Study. These data are particularly well suited for studying immigrant mothers over time because of their diverse samples, high response rates and longitudinal designs. Revealing the early origins of inequality in the health environments of immigrant and native-born families is an important step toward identifying critical periods of investment, especially as children in immigrant families comprise an increasing proportion of all children and adolescents (Hernandez 2004).en_US
dc.format.extent192 - 218en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Scienceen_US
dc.rightsAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.titleNativity Differences in Mothers' Health Behaviors: A Cross-National and Longitudinal Lensen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1177/0002716212445438-
dc.identifier.eissn1552-3349-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Nativity_Differences_Mothers_2012.pdf353.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.