Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Skip to main content

Uncharted Ground: Canada, Middle Power Leadership, and Public Diplomacy

Author(s): Baxter, Laurence; Bishop, Jo-Ann

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1sq8qj1k
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaxter, Laurence-
dc.contributor.authorBishop, Jo-Ann-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-06T16:10:35Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-06T16:10:35Z-
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1sq8qj1k-
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines Canada's role in the treaty to ban landmines as an innovative foreign policy process. In doing so, the Cooper, Higgott, and Nossal middle power typology is applied to Canada's leadership in the Ottawa Process which culmi­nated in the signing of the historic treaty in December 1997. It is argued that Canada's leadership in the Ottawa Process was made possible through a synergy of states, international orga­nizations, and a global network of non-governmental organi­zations. It is this new form of "public diplomacy" that the authors contend has redefined Canada's traditional approach to multilateralism. As a case study, important policy lessons can be extrapolated from this paper's analysis.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Public and International Affairsen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.en_US
dc.titleUncharted Ground: Canada, Middle Power Leadership, and Public Diplomacyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
5.pdf1.71 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.