Skip to main content

Associative processes in intuitive judgment

Author(s): Morewedge, Carey K.; Kahneman, Daniel

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1qb5t
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMorewedge, Carey K.-
dc.contributor.authorKahneman, Daniel-
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-19T17:48:09Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-19T17:48:09Z-
dc.date.issued2010-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationMorewedge, Carey K., Kahneman, Daniel. (2010). Associative processes in intuitive judgment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14 (10), 435 - 440. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.004en_US
dc.identifier.issn1364-6613-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1qb5t-
dc.description.abstractDual-system models of reasoning attribute errors of judgment to two failures. The automatic operations of a “System 1” generate a faulty intuition, which the controlled operations of a “System 2” fail to detect and correct. We identify System 1 with the automatic operations of associative memory and draw on research in the priming paradigm to describe how it operates. We explain how three features of associative memory—associative coherence, attribute substitution, and processing fluency—give rise to major biases of intuitive judgment. Our article highlights both the ability of System 1 to create complex and skilled judgments and the role of the system as a source of judgment errors.en_US
dc.format.extent435 - 440en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTrends in Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.titleAssociative processes in intuitive judgmenten_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.004-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
nihms-225350.pdf261.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.