Skip to main content

Accounting for Behavior in Treatment Effects: New Applications for Blind Trials

Author(s): Chassang, Sylvain; Snowberg, Erik; Seymour, Ben; Bowles, Cayley

To refer to this page use:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChassang, Sylvain-
dc.contributor.authorSnowberg, Erik-
dc.contributor.authorSeymour, Ben-
dc.contributor.authorBowles, Cayley-
dc.identifier.citationChassang, Sylvain, Snowberg, Erik, Seymour, Ben, Bowles, Cayley. (2015). Accounting for Behavior in Treatment Effects: New Applications for Blind Trials. PLOS ONE, 10 (6), e0127227 - e0127227. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127227en_US
dc.description.abstractThe double-blind randomized controlled trial (DBRCT) is the gold standard of medical research. We show that DBRCTs fail to fully account for the efficacy of treatment if there are interactions between treatment and behavior, for example, if a treatment is more effective when patients change their exercise or diet. Since behavioral or placebo effects depend on patients' beliefs that they are receiving treatment, clinical trials with a single probability of treatment are poorly suited to estimate the additional treatment benefit that arises from such interactions. Here, we propose methods to identify interaction effects, and use those methods in a meta-analysis of data from blinded anti-depressant trials in which participant-level data was available. Out of six eligible studies, which included three for the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor paroxetine, and three for the tricyclic imipramine, three studies had a high (>65%) probability of treatment. We found strong evidence that treatment probability affected the behavior of trial participants, specifically the decision to drop out of a trial. In the case of paroxetine, but not imipramine, there was an interaction between treatment and behavioral changes that enhanced the effectiveness of the drug. These data show that standard blind trials can fail to account for the full value added when there are interactions between a treatment and behavior. We therefore suggest that a new trial design, two-by-two blind trials, will better account for treatment efficacy when interaction effects may be important.en_US
dc.format.extente0127227 - e0127227 (1-13)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofPLOS ONEen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. This is an open access article.en_US
dc.titleAccounting for Behavior in Treatment Effects: New Applications for Blind Trialsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chassang-2015-Accounting for Behavior in Treat.pdf746.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Download

Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.