Skip to main content

Race, Democracy, and Empire: Delegates to Congress from DC and the Territories

Author(s): Mamet, Elliot; Bussing, Austin

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1k93166p
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMamet, Elliot-
dc.contributor.authorBussing, Austin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-22T19:33:25Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-22T19:33:25Z-
dc.date.issued2024-05-17en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1k93166p-
dc.description.abstractBoth democracy and empire are central to American political development. Yet, the role of Congress—that organ of democratic politics—in the expansion of US empire is not well understood. This article explains how and why Congress institutionalized representation from Washington, DC and the US territories in the mid-twentieth century. We uncover the history of a puzzling position: the Congressional delegate, who is permitted to debate, but not vote. Drawing on extensive original archival research and quantitative analysis of legislative voting behavior, this article explicates how racial attitudes structured conflict over the delegate position. We highlight the centrality of racial ideas to the institutional- ization of American empire in the mid-twentieth century.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofPolityen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. This is an open access article.en_US
dc.subjectCongress, American political development, race, empire, civil rights, federalismen_US
dc.titleRace, Democracy, and Empire: Delegates to Congress from DC and the Territoriesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1086/730774-

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
730774.pdf152.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.