Skip to main content

Non-Compliance and Ultimate Remedies under the WTO Dispute Settlement System

Author(s): Ali, Asim Imdad

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1jd4pp86
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAli, Asim Imdad-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-20T16:46:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-20T16:46:43Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1jd4pp86-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the question of non-compliance and ultimate remedies under the WTO dispute settlement system. When two members have a trade dispute settled by the WTO, the dispute settlement body issues a formal binding ruling; however, if a member does not comply, final enforcement remains problematic. The WTO authorizes countermeasures to be taken by individual states. These retaliatory provisions, however, fail on many counts: on effectiveness; on defeating the foundational principles of the WTO, such as free trade; by causing “double-injury” to those who win the case; on being “the epitome of mercantilism”; and lastly, on favoring a power-based system and undermining the rule-based system of adjudication. Arguably, the WTO has the best dispute settlement system of any international organization. Nevertheless, the WTO does not have the best compliance system. Reform is an urgent necessity for the continued stability and predictability of the entire regime.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Public and International Affairsen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.en_US
dc.titleNon-Compliance and Ultimate Remedies under the WTO Dispute Settlement Systemen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2003-1.pdf173.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.