Skip to main content

Evaluating the measurement reliabilities and dimensionality of developmental idealism measures

Author(s): Thornton, Arland; Binstock, Georgina; Young-DeMarco, Linda; Mitchell, Colter; Yount, Kathryn M.; et al

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1gz1k
Abstract: This paper investigates the measurement of developmental idealism. Developmental idealism is a set of beliefs and values stating that modern societies and families are better than traditional societies and families, that modern families facilitate modern societies, and that modern societies foster modern families. Prior research has shown that developmental idealism is widespread globally but has provided little evidence about whether beliefs concerning developmental idealism can be measured reliably at the individual level. It also has provided little information about the dimensionality and psychometric properties of measures of developmental idealism. Using cross-sectional survey data from Argentina, China, and Egypt, we explore and test the factor structure underlying observed measures for aspects of developmental idealism and estimate the reliability of different models. Theory and data suggest that developmental idealism consists of multiple dimensions, and when family-related items are measuring similar underlying constructs, the measurement reliabilities are high. These results provide evidence that the dimensions of developmental idealism can be measured with a high degree of reliability.
Publication Date: 1-Oct-2016
Citation: Thornton, A, Binstock, G, Young-DeMarco, L, Mitchell, C, Yount, KM, Xie, Y. (2016). Evaluating the measurement reliabilities and dimensionality of developmental idealism measures. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2 (4), 609 - 635. doi:10.1177/2057150X16672813
DOI: doi:10.1177/2057150X16672813
ISSN: 2057-150X
EISSN: 2057-1518
Pages: 609 - 635
Type of Material: Journal Article
Journal/Proceeding Title: Chinese Journal of Sociology
Version: Author's manuscript



Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.