Skip to main content

Evaluating the measurement reliabilities and dimensionality of developmental idealism measures

Author(s): Thornton, Arland; Binstock, Georgina; Young-DeMarco, Linda; Mitchell, Colter; Yount, Kathryn M.; et al

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1gz1k
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThornton, Arland-
dc.contributor.authorBinstock, Georgina-
dc.contributor.authorYoung-DeMarco, Linda-
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Colter-
dc.contributor.authorYount, Kathryn M.-
dc.contributor.authorXie, Yu-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-10T21:55:22Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-10T21:55:22Z-
dc.date.issued2016-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationThornton, A, Binstock, G, Young-DeMarco, L, Mitchell, C, Yount, KM, Xie, Y. (2016). Evaluating the measurement reliabilities and dimensionality of developmental idealism measures. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2 (4), 609 - 635. doi:10.1177/2057150X16672813en_US
dc.identifier.issn2057-150X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1gz1k-
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the measurement of developmental idealism. Developmental idealism is a set of beliefs and values stating that modern societies and families are better than traditional societies and families, that modern families facilitate modern societies, and that modern societies foster modern families. Prior research has shown that developmental idealism is widespread globally but has provided little evidence about whether beliefs concerning developmental idealism can be measured reliably at the individual level. It also has provided little information about the dimensionality and psychometric properties of measures of developmental idealism. Using cross-sectional survey data from Argentina, China, and Egypt, we explore and test the factor structure underlying observed measures for aspects of developmental idealism and estimate the reliability of different models. Theory and data suggest that developmental idealism consists of multiple dimensions, and when family-related items are measuring similar underlying constructs, the measurement reliabilities are high. These results provide evidence that the dimensions of developmental idealism can be measured with a high degree of reliability.en_US
dc.format.extent609 - 635en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofChinese Journal of Sociologyen_US
dc.rightsAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.titleEvaluating the measurement reliabilities and dimensionality of developmental idealism measuresen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1177/2057150X16672813-
dc.identifier.eissn2057-1518-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AM_Evaluating_measurement_reliabilities_and_dimensionality.pdf1.29 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.