Skip to main content

Pathway dynamics in the optimal quantum control of rubidium: Cooperation and competition

Author(s): Gao, Fang; Rey-de-Castro, Roberto; Donovan, Ashley M.; Xu, Jian; Wang, Yaoxiong; et al

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1gv4p
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGao, Fang-
dc.contributor.authorRey-de-Castro, Roberto-
dc.contributor.authorDonovan, Ashley M.-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Jian-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yaoxiong-
dc.contributor.authorRabitz, Herschel-
dc.contributor.authorShuang, Feng-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-30T18:35:44Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-30T18:35:44Z-
dc.date.issued2014-02-13en_US
dc.identifier.citationGao, Fang, Rey-de-Castro, Roberto, Donovan, Ashley M., Xu, Jian, Wang, Yaoxiong, Rabitz, Herschel, Shuang, Feng. (2014). Pathway dynamics in the optimal quantum control of rubidium: Cooperation and competition. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 89 (10.1103/PhysRevA.89.023416en_US
dc.identifier.issn1050-2947-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1gv4p-
dc.description.abstractThe dynamics that take place in the optimal quantum control of atomic rubidium upon population transfer from state 5S(1/2) to state 5D(3/2) are investigated with Hamiltonian-encoding-observable-decoding (HE-OD). For modest laser powers two second-order pathways, 5S(1/2). 5P(3/2). 5D(3/2) (pathway 1) and 5S(1/2). 5P(1/2). 5D(3/2) (pathway 2), govern the population transfer process. Pathway 1 has larger transition dipoles than pathway 2. However, state 5P(3/2) along pathway 1 may also be excited to an undesired state 5D(5/2), which can result in population “leakage.” Thus, the two pathways may either cooperate or compete with each other in various dynamical regimes. An important feature in the case of cooperation is that the ratio between the amplitudes of pathways 1 and 2 oscillates over time with a frequency equal to the detuning between transitions 5S(1/2). 5P(3/2) and 5P(3/2). 5D(3/2). We also study the regime in which pathway 2 dominates the dynamics when the larger transition dipoles of pathway 1 can no longer compensate for its population leakage. The overall analysis illustrates the utility of HE-OD as a tool to reveal the quantum control mechanism.en_US
dc.format.extent023416-1 - 023416-9en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPHYSICAL REVIEW Aen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.en_US
dc.titlePathway dynamics in the optimal quantum control of rubidium: Cooperation and competitionen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1103/PhysRevA.89.023416-
dc.identifier.eissn1094-1622-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PhysRevA.89.023416.pdf651.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.