To refer to this page use:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1fp2mFull metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Singer, Peter | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-25T14:48:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-25T14:48:20Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-06-01 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Singer, Peter. "Brain death: A response to the commentaries." Ethics & Bioethics 9, no. 1-2 (2019): 81-85. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1338-5615 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1fp2m | - |
| dc.description.abstract | © 2019 Peter Singer, published by Sciendo 2019. My recent article, "The challenge of brain death for the sanctity of life ethic" (Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 2018, 8 (3-4), pp. 153-165) elicited five commentaries. In this brief response, I clarify my own position in the light of some misunderstandings, and discuss whether the definition of death is best thought of as an ethical question, or as a matter of fact. I also comment on the suggestion that we should allow people to choose the criteria by which they wish their own death to be determined, or their organs removed to be donated to others. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 81 - 85 | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) | en_US |
| dc.rights | Final published version. This is an open access article. | en_US |
| dc.title | Brain death: A response to the commentaries | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | doi:10.2478/ebce-2019-0007 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2453-7829 | - |
| pu.type.symplectic | http://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-article | en_US |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BrainDeathResponseToCommentaries.pdf | 324.89 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Download |
Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.