Skip to main content

The Intelligence Authorization Act of 1991 and Its Implications for Congressional Oversight of Covert Action

Author(s): Everitt, Ladd

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1d21rj2n
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEveritt, Ladd-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-17T19:25:16Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-17T19:25:16Z-
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1d21rj2n-
dc.description.abstractAlthough the Intelligence Authorization Act of 1991 enacted several important statutory requirements for the approval and reporting of covert operations, loopholes remain in the legislation that permit the president to delay notification of covert operations to Congress for extended periods of time and to involve nongovernmental entities in the conduct of such actions. The ambiguity created by such loopholes serves to blur the line between the powers of the executive and legislative branches and to increase the possibility of conflict between the president and Congress in the future. Effective oversight of covert operations in the 1990s will therefore rely heavily on the good faith of both members of Congress and executive officials and on the willingness of both parties to work together in an honest and cooperative fashion.en_US
dc.format.extent171-187en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Public and International Affairsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 6;-
dc.rightsFinal published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.en_US
dc.titleThe Intelligence Authorization Act of 1991 and Its Implications for Congressional Oversight of Covert Actionen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Everitt.pdf1.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.