Skip to main content

State-Building from the Outside-In: UNMIK and Its Paradox

Author(s): Lemay-Hebert, Nicolas

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1833mz51
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLemay-Hebert, Nicolas-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-21T17:16:19Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-21T17:16:19Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1833mz51-
dc.description.abstractIf most of the literature on state-building has extensively covered the question of the increasing interference by United Nations peacekeeping missions, including the broadening scopes and mandates of these missions, not much has been said about the political dilemmas that the exercise of these competencies tend to create locally. This article will explore the particular legitimacy paradox affecting direct governance by an interna tional administration. The article’s main argument is that direct governance by an international administration tends to create the conditions for its own illegitimacy, portraying the state building process as exogenous to the local society. This article will specifically analyze the UN Mission in Kosovo, one of the most comprehensive and yet most challenged state-building attempts the UN has faced.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Public and International Affairsen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.en_US
dc.titleState-Building from the Outside-In: UNMIK and Its Paradoxen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2009-4.pdf171.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.