Skip to main content

Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation

Author(s): Imai, Kosuke; Ratkovic, Marc

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1376w
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorImai, Kosuke-
dc.contributor.authorRatkovic, Marc-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-19T21:21:28Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-19T21:21:28Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationImai, K, Ratkovic, M. (2013). Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation. Annals of Applied Statistics, 7 (1), 443 - 470. doi:10.1214/12-AOAS593en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6157-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1376w-
dc.description.abstractWhen evaluating the efficacy of social programs and medical treatments using randomized experiments, the estimated overall average causal effect alone is often of limited value and the researchers must investigate when the treatments do and do not work. Indeed, the estimation of treatment effect heterogeneity plays an essential role in (1) selecting the most effective treatment from a large number of available treatments, (2) ascertaining subpopulations for which a treatment is effective or harmful, (3) designing individualized optimal treatment regimes, (4) testing for the existence or lack of heterogeneous treatment effects, and (5) generalizing causal effect estimates obtained from an experimental sample to a target population. In this paper, we formulate the estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects as a variable selection problem. We propose a method that adapts the Support Vector Machine classifier by placing separate sparsity constraints over the pre-treatment parameters and causal heterogeneity parameters of interest. The proposed method is motivated by and applied to two well-known randomized evaluation studies in the social sciences. Our method selects the most effective voter mobilization strategies from a large number of alternative strategies, and it also identifies the characteristics of workers who greatly benefit from (or are negatively affected by) a job training program. In our simulation studies, we find that the proposed method often outperforms some commonly used alternatives. © 2013 Institute of Mathematical Statistics.en_US
dc.format.extent443 - 470en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Applied Statisticsen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.en_US
dc.titleEstimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluationen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1214/12-AOAS593-
dc.identifier.eissn1941-7330-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
[AnnalsofAppliedStatistics]Imai and Ratkovic.pdf451.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.