Skip to main content

Can modalities save naive set theory?

Author(s): Fritz, Peter; Lederman, Harvey; Liu, Tiankai; Scott, Dana

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr12n4zh23
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFritz, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorLederman, Harvey-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Tiankai-
dc.contributor.authorScott, Dana-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-25T14:49:45Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-25T14:49:45Z-
dc.date.issued2018-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationFritz, Peter, Harvey Lederman, Tiankai Liu, and Dana Scott. "Can modalities save naive set theory?." The Review of Symbolic Logic 11, no. 1 (2018): 21-47.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1755-0203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr12n4zh23-
dc.format.extent21 - 47en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofReview of Symbolic Logicen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. This is an open access article.en_US
dc.titleCan modalities save naive set theory?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1017/S1755020317000168-
dc.identifier.eissn1755-0211-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CanModalitiesSave.pdf252.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.