Learning From South Africa: The TRC, the ICC and the Future of Accountability

Author(s): Hart, Christine M.

Download

To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1251fk6v

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Hart, Christine M.	-
dc.date.accessioned	2024-10-31T17:25:14Z	-
dc.date.available	2024-10-31T17:25:14Z	-
dc.date.issued	2001	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1251fk6v	-
dc.description.abstract	South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission ("TRC") has drawn considerable international attention as the first comprehensive non-prosecutorial approach to past human rights abuses that maintained the principle of accountability. This paper will make the argument that for both practical and normative reasons, mechanisms like the TRC that provide accountability but fall short of formal prosecutions should be not only respected but supported by the international legal community.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Public and International Affairs	en_US
dc.rights	Final published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.	en_US
dc.title	Learning From South Africa: The TRC, the ICC and the Future of Accountability	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article	en_US

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
2001-2.pdf		2.51 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Download