To refer to this page use:
|Abstract:||We link the intensity of campaign competition in different electoral systems with the number of candidates running for public office and their ideological differentiation. We show that proportional elections have more candidates, competing less aggressively in campaign spending, than those in majoritarian elections. Candidates' ideological positions, however, can in general be more differentiated in majoritarian or proportional elections. We also study the equilibrium effects of plurality premiums and the consequences of heterogeneity among candidates in nonideological characteristics. © 2013 Southern Political Science Association.|
|Citation:||Iaryczower, M, Mattozzi, A. (2013). On the Nature of Competition in Alternative Electoral Systems. Journal of Politics, 75 (3), 743 - 756. doi:10.1017/S0022381613000583|
|Pages:||743 - 756|
|Type of Material:||Journal Article|
|Journal/Proceeding Title:||Journal of Politics|
|Version:||Final published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.|
Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.