To refer to this page use:
|Abstract:||© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. The commentators in this Special Issue raise questions about a number of aspects of the book. One group of critics questions the book’s overall normative strategy, asking whether too much weight is placed on the idea of neutrality. A second group raises doubts about the account of neutrality itself. A third zeroes in on the book’s discussion of language rights. And a fourth group is critical of the book’s assumptions about democracy, and about its relevance to public policy disputes. In this reply, I seek to address each of these clusters of concerns. In some places, I suggest, my commentators have misunderstood my position. In other places, I argue, they have not sufficiently thought through the implications of their alternatives to that position.|
|Citation:||Patten, A. (2017). Equal citizenship, neutrality, and democracy: a reply to critics of Equal Recognition. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20 (1), 127 - 141. doi:10.1080/13698230.2016.1253173|
|Pages:||1 - 27|
|Type of Material:||Journal Article|
|Journal/Proceeding Title:||Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy|
Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.