Skip to main content

ΛCDM or self-interacting neutrinos: How CMB data can tell the two models apart

Author(s): Park, Minsu; Kreisch, Christina D; Dunkley, Jo; Hadzhiyska, Boryana; Cyr-Racine, Francis-Yan

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1x63b572
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPark, Minsu-
dc.contributor.authorKreisch, Christina D-
dc.contributor.authorDunkley, Jo-
dc.contributor.authorHadzhiyska, Boryana-
dc.contributor.authorCyr-Racine, Francis-Yan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-10T15:35:11Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-10T15:35:11Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-20en_US
dc.identifier.citationPark, Minsu, Kreisch, Christina D, Dunkley, Jo, Hadzhiyska, Boryana, Cyr-Racine, Francis-Yan. (<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>CDM</mml:mi></mml:math> or self-interacting neutrinos: How CMB data can tell the two models apart. Physical Review D, 100 (6), 10.1103/physrevd.100.063524en_US
dc.identifier.issn2470-0010-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1x63b572-
dc.description.abstractOf the many proposed extensions to the ΛCDM paradigm, a model in which neutrinos self-interact until close to the epoch of matter-radiation equality has been shown to provide a good fit to current cosmic microwave background (CMB) data, while at the same time alleviating tensions with late-time measurements of the expansion rate and matter fluctuation amplitude. Interestingly, CMB fits to this model either pick out a specific large value of the neutrino interaction strength, or are consistent with the extremely weak neutrino interaction found in ΛCDM, resulting in a bimodal posterior distribution for the neutrino self-interaction cross section. In this paper, we explore why current cosmological data select this particular large neutrino self-interaction strength, and by consequence, disfavor intermediate values of the self-interaction cross section. We show how it is the l ≳ 1000 CMB temperature anisotropies, most recently measured by the Planck satellite, that produce this bimodality. We also establish that smaller scale temperature data, and improved polarization data measuring the temperature-polarization cross-correlation, will best constrain the neutrino self-interaction strength. We forecast that the upcoming Simons Observatory should be capable of distinguishing between the modelsen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPhysical Review Den_US
dc.rightsAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.titleΛCDM or self-interacting neutrinos: How CMB data can tell the two models aparten_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1103/physrevd.100.063524-
dc.date.eissued2019-09-20en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2470-0029-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1904.02625v2.pdf9.29 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.