Skip to main content

Two-dimensional Core-collapse Supernova Models with Multi-dimensional Transport

Author(s): Dolence, Joshua C; Burrows, Adam S.; Zhang, Weiqun

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1s98c
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDolence, Joshua C-
dc.contributor.authorBurrows, Adam S.-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Weiqun-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-10T19:31:02Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-10T19:31:02Z-
dc.date.issued2015-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationDolence, Joshua C, Burrows, Adam, Zhang, Weiqun. (2015). Two-dimensional Core-collapse Supernova Models with Multi-dimensional Transport. \apj, 800 (10 - 10. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/10en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1s98c-
dc.description.abstractWe present new two-dimensional (2D) axisymmetric neutrino radiation/hydrodynamic models of core-collapse supernova (CCSN) cores. We use the CASTRO code, which incorporates truly multi-dimensional, multi-group,flux-limited diffusion (MGFLD) neutrino transport, including all relevantO(v/c) terms. Our main motivationfor carrying out this study is to compare with recent 2D models produced by other groups who have obtained explosions for some progenitor stars and with recent 2D VULCAN results that did not incorporate O(v/c) terms.We follow the evolution of 12, 15, 20, and 25 solar-mass progenitors to approximately 600 ms after bounce and do not obtain an explosion in any of these models. Though the reason for the qualitative disagreement among the groups engaged in CCSN modeling remains unclear, we speculate that the simplifying “ray-by-ray” approach employed by all other groups may be compromising their results. We show that “ray-by-ray” calculations greatly exaggerate the angular and temporal variations of the neutrino fluxes, which we argue are better captured by our multi-dimensional MGFLD approach. On the other hand, our 2D models also make approximations, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions concerning the root of the differences between groups. We discuss some of the diagnostics often employed in the analyses of CCSN simulations and highlight the intimate relationship between the various explosion conditions that have been proposed. Finally, we explore the ingredients that may be missing in current calculations that may be important in reproducing the properties of the average CCSNe, should the delayed neutrino-heating mechanism be the correct mechanism of explosion.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAstrophysical Journalen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. This is an open access article.en_US
dc.titleTwo-dimensional Core-collapse Supernova Models with Multi-dimensional Transporten_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/10-
dc.date.eissued2015-02-03en_US
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dolence_2015_ApJ_800_10.pdf1.49 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.