Skip to main content

ENSO Transition, Duration, and Amplitude Asymmetries: Role of the Nonlinear Wind Stress Coupling in a Conceptual Model

Author(s): Choi, Kit-Yan; Vecchi, Gabriel A; Wittenberg, Andrew T

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1pg1hn49
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Kit-Yan-
dc.contributor.authorVecchi, Gabriel A-
dc.contributor.authorWittenberg, Andrew T-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-25T15:00:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-25T15:00:21Z-
dc.date.issued2013-12-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationChoi, Kit-Yan, Gabriel A. Vecchi, and Andrew T. Wittenberg. "ENSO transition, duration, and amplitude asymmetries: Role of the nonlinear wind stress coupling in a conceptual model." Journal of Climate 26, no. 23 (2013): 9462-9476. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00045.1.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0894-8755-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1pg1hn49-
dc.description.abstractThe El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) exhibits well-known asymmetries: 1) warm events are stronger than cold events, 2) strong warm events are more likely to be followed by cold events than vice versa, and 3) cold events are more persistent than warm events. Coupled GCM simulations, however, continue to underestimate many of these observed features. To shed light on these asymmetries, the authors begin with a widely used delayed-oscillator conceptual model for ENSO and modify it so that wind stress anomalies depend more strongly on SST anomalies (SSTAs) during warm conditions, as is observed. Then the impact of this nonlinearity on ENSO is explored for three dynamical regimes: self-sustained oscillations, stochastically driven oscillations, and self-sustained oscillations disrupted by stochastic forcings. In all three regimes, the nonlinear air–sea coupling preferentially strengthens the feedbacks (both positive and delayed negative) during the ENSO warm phase—producing El Niños that grow to a larger amplitude and overshoot more rapidly and consistently into the opposite phase, than do the La Niñas. Finally, the modified oscillator is applied to observational records and to control simulations from two global coupled ocean–atmosphere–land–ice models [Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Climate Model version 2.1 (GFDL CM2.1) and version 2.5 (GFDL CM2.5)] to elucidate the causes of their differing asymmetries.en_US
dc.format.extent9462 - 9476en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Climateen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.en_US
dc.titleENSO Transition, Duration, and Amplitude Asymmetries: Role of the Nonlinear Wind Stress Coupling in a Conceptual Modelen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00045.1-
dc.identifier.eissn1520-0442-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ENSO_transition_duration_amplitude_asymmetries_Role_nonlinear_wind_stress_coupling_conceptual_model.pdf1.83 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.