Skip to main content

Density split statistics: Cosmological constraints from counts and lensing in cells in DES Y1 and SDSS data

Author(s): Gruen, D; Friedrich, O; Krause, E; DeRose, J; Cawthon, R; et al

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1g44hq34
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGruen, D-
dc.contributor.authorFriedrich, O-
dc.contributor.authorKrause, E-
dc.contributor.authorDeRose, J-
dc.contributor.authorCawthon, R-
dc.contributor.authorDavis, C-
dc.contributor.authorElvin-Poole, J-
dc.contributor.authorRykoff, ES-
dc.contributor.authorWechsler, RH-
dc.contributor.authorAlarcon, A-
dc.contributor.authorBernstein, GM-
dc.contributor.authorBlazek, J-
dc.contributor.authorChang, C-
dc.contributor.authorClampitt, J-
dc.contributor.authorCrocce, M-
dc.contributor.authorDe Vicente, J-
dc.contributor.authorGatti, M-
dc.contributor.authorGill, MSS-
dc.contributor.authorHartley, WG-
dc.contributor.authorHilbert, S-
dc.contributor.authorHoyle, B-
dc.contributor.authorJain, B-
dc.contributor.authorJarvis, M-
dc.contributor.authorLahav, O-
dc.contributor.authorMacCrann, N-
dc.contributor.authorMcClintock, T-
dc.contributor.authorPrat, J-
dc.contributor.authorRollins, RP-
dc.contributor.authorRoss, AJ-
dc.contributor.authorRozo, E-
dc.contributor.authorSamuroff, S-
dc.contributor.authorSanchez, C-
dc.contributor.authorSheldon, E-
dc.contributor.authorTroxel, MA-
dc.contributor.authorZuntz, J-
dc.contributor.authorAbbott, TMC-
dc.contributor.authorAbdalla, FB-
dc.contributor.authorAllam, S-
dc.contributor.authorAnnis, J-
dc.contributor.authorBechtol, K-
dc.contributor.authorBenoit-Levy, A-
dc.contributor.authorBertin, E-
dc.contributor.authorBridle, SL-
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, D-
dc.contributor.authorBuckley-Geer, E-
dc.contributor.authorRosell, A Carnero-
dc.contributor.authorKind, M Carrasco-
dc.contributor.authorCarretero, J-
dc.contributor.authorCunha, CE-
dc.contributor.authorD Andrea, CB-
dc.contributor.authorda Costa, LN-
dc.contributor.authorDesai, S-
dc.contributor.authorDiehl, HT-
dc.contributor.authorDietrich, JP-
dc.contributor.authorDoel, P-
dc.contributor.authorDrlica-Wagner, A-
dc.contributor.authorFernandez, E-
dc.contributor.authorFlaugher, B-
dc.contributor.authorFosalba, P-
dc.contributor.authorFrieman, J-
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Bellido, J-
dc.contributor.authorGaztanaga, E-
dc.contributor.authorGiannantonio, T-
dc.contributor.authorGruendl, RA-
dc.contributor.authorGschwend, J-
dc.contributor.authorGutierrez, G-
dc.contributor.authorHonscheid, K-
dc.contributor.authorJames, DJ-
dc.contributor.authorJeltema, T-
dc.contributor.authorKuehn, K-
dc.contributor.authorKuropatkin, N-
dc.contributor.authorLima, M-
dc.contributor.authorMarch, M-
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, JL-
dc.contributor.authorMartini, P-
dc.contributor.authorMelchior, Peter M-
dc.contributor.authorMenanteau, F-
dc.contributor.authorMiquel, R-
dc.contributor.authorMohr, JJ-
dc.contributor.authorPlazas, AA-
dc.contributor.authorRoodman, A-
dc.contributor.authorSanchez, E-
dc.contributor.authorScarpine, V-
dc.contributor.authorSchubnell, M-
dc.contributor.authorSevilla-Noarbe, I-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, M-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, RC-
dc.contributor.authorSoares-Santos, M-
dc.contributor.authorSobreira, F-
dc.contributor.authorSwanson, MEC-
dc.contributor.authorTarle, G-
dc.contributor.authorThomas, D-
dc.contributor.authorVikram, V-
dc.contributor.authorWalker, AR-
dc.contributor.authorWeller, J-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Y-
dc.contributor.authorCollaboration, DES-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-25T15:01:36Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-25T15:01:36Z-
dc.date.issued2018-07-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationGruen, D, Friedrich, O, Krause, E, DeRose, J, Cawthon, R, Davis, C, Elvin-Poole, J, Rykoff, ES, Wechsler, RH, Alarcon, A, Bernstein, GM, Blazek, J, Chang, C, Clampitt, J, Crocce, M, De Vicente, J, Gatti, M, Gill, MSS, Hartley, WG, Hilbert, S, Hoyle, B, Jain, B, Jarvis, M, Lahav, O, MacCrann, N, McClintock, T, Prat, J, Rollins, RP, Ross, AJ, Rozo, E, Samuroff, S, Sanchez, C, Sheldon, E, Troxel, MA, Zuntz, J, Abbott, TMC, Abdalla, FB, Allam, S, Annis, J, Bechtol, K, Benoit-Levy, A, Bertin, E, Bridle, SL, Brooks, D, Buckley-Geer, E, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Carretero, J, Cunha, CE, D Andrea, CB, da Costa, LN, Desai, S, Diehl, HT, Dietrich, JP, Doel, P, Drlica-Wagner, A, Fernandez, E, Flaugher, B, Fosalba, P, Frieman, J, Garcia-Bellido, J, Gaztanaga, E, Giannantonio, T, Gruendl, RA, Gschwend, J, Gutierrez, G, Honscheid, K, James, DJ, Jeltema, T, Kuehn, K, Kuropatkin, N, Lima, M, March, M, Marshall, JL, Martini, P, Melchior, P, Menanteau, F, Miquel, R, Mohr, JJ, Plazas, AA, Roodman, A, Sanchez, E, Scarpine, V, Schubnell, M, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Smith, M, Smith, RC, Soares-Santos, M, Sobreira, F, Swanson, MEC, Tarle, G, Thomas, D, Vikram, V, Walker, AR, Weller, J, Zhang, Y, Collaboration, DES. (2018). Density split statistics: Cosmological constraints from counts and lensing in cells in DES Y1 and SDSS data. PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 98 (10.1103/PhysRevD.98.023507en_US
dc.identifier.issn2470-0010-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1g44hq34-
dc.description.abstractWe derive cosmological constraints from the probability distribution function (PDF) of evolved large-scale matter density fluctuations. We do this by splitting lines of sight by density based on their count of tracer galaxies, and by measuring both gravitational shear around and counts-in-cells in overdense and underdense lines of sight, in Dark Energy Survey (DES) First Year and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data. Our analysis uses a perturbation theory model [O. Friedrich et al., Phys. Rev. D 98, 023508 (2018)] and is validated using N-body simulation realizations and log-normal mocks. It allows us to constrain cosmology, bias and stochasticity of galaxies with respect to matter density and, in addition, the skewness of the matter density field. From a Bayesian model comparison, we find that the data weakly prefer a connection of galaxies and matter that is stochastic beyond Poisson fluctuations on <= 20 arcmin angular smoothing scale. The two stochasticity models we fit yield DES constraints on the matter density Omega(m) = 0.26(-0.04)(+0.05) and Omega(m) = 0.28(-0.03)(+0.04) that are consistent with each other. These values also agree with the DES analysis of galaxy and shear two-point functions (3x2pt, DES Collaboration et al.) that only uses second moments of the PDF. Constraints on s 8 are model dependent (sigma(8) = 0.97(-0.06)(+0.07) and 0.80(-0.07)(+0.06) for the two stochasticity models), but consistent with each other and with the 3 x 2pt results if stochasticity is at the low end of the posterior range. As an additional test of gravity, counts and lensing in cells allow to compare the skewness S-3 of the matter density PDF to its Lambda CDM prediction. We find no evidence of excess skewness in any model or data set, with better than 25 per cent relative precision in the skewness estimate from DES alone.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relationhttps://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PhRvD..98b3507G/abstracten_US
dc.relation.ispartofPHYSICAL REVIEW Den_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.en_US
dc.titleDensity split statistics: Cosmological constraints from counts and lensing in cells in DES Y1 and SDSS dataen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.023507-
dc.date.eissued2018-07-13en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2470-0029-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
023507.pdf4.62 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.