Skip to main content

Global seismic tomography with sparsity constraints: Comparison with smoothing and damping regularization

Author(s): Charléty, Jean; Voronin, Sergey; Nolet, Guust; Loris, Ignace; Simons, Frederik J; et al

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1dj58g3w
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCharléty, Jean-
dc.contributor.authorVoronin, Sergey-
dc.contributor.authorNolet, Guust-
dc.contributor.authorLoris, Ignace-
dc.contributor.authorSimons, Frederik J-
dc.contributor.authorSigloch, Karin-
dc.contributor.authorDaubechies, Ingrid C-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-25T14:59:20Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-25T14:59:20Z-
dc.date.issued2013-08-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationCharlety, Jean, Sergey Voronin, Guust Nolet, Ignace Loris, Frederik J. Simons, Karin Sigloch, and Ingrid C. Daubechies. "Global seismic tomography with sparsity constraints: Comparison with smoothing and damping regularization." Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 118, no. 9 (2013): 4887-4899. doi:10.1002/jgrb.50326.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2169-9313-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1dj58g3w-
dc.description.abstractWe present a realistic application of an inversion scheme for global seismic tomography that uses as prior information the sparsity of a solution, defined as having few nonzero coefficients under the action of a linear transformation. In this paper, the sparsifying transform is a wavelet transform. We use an accelerated iterative soft‐thresholding algorithm for a regularization strategy, which produces sparse models in the wavelet domain. The approach and scheme we present may be of use for preserving sharp edges in a tomographic reconstruction and minimizing the number of features in the solution warranted by the data. The method is tested on a data set of time delays for finite‐frequency tomography using the USArray network, the first application in global seismic tomography to real data. The approach presented should also be suitable for other imaging problems. From a comparison with a more traditional inversion using damping and smoothing constraints, we show that (1) we generally retrieve similar features, (2) fewer nonzero coefficients under a properly chosen representation (such as wavelets) are needed to explain the data at the same level of root‐mean‐square misfit, (3) the model is sparse or compressible in the wavelet domain, and (4) we do not need to construct a heterogeneous mesh to capture the available resolution.en_US
dc.format.extent4887 - 4899en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earthen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.en_US
dc.titleGlobal seismic tomography with sparsity constraints: Comparison with smoothing and damping regularizationen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1002/jgrb.50326-
dc.identifier.eissn2169-9356-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Global_seismic_tomography_sparsity_constraints_Comparison_smoothing_damping_regularization.pdf1.69 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.