Skip to main content

Tree-width and planar minors

Author(s): Leaf, Alexander; Seymour, Paul D.

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1837h
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeaf, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorSeymour, Paul D.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-20T15:07:35Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-20T15:07:35Z-
dc.date.issued2015-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationLeaf, Alexander, Seymour, Paul. (2015). Tree-width and planar minors. JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL THEORY SERIES B, 111 (38 - 53. doi:10.1016/j.jctb.2014.09.003en_US
dc.identifier.issn0095-8956-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1837h-
dc.description.abstractRobertson and the second author [7] proved in 1986 that for all h there exists f(h) such that for every h-vertex simple planar graph H, every graph with no H-minor has treewidth at most f (h); but how small can we make f (h)? The original bound was an iterated exponential tower, but in 1994 with Thomas [9] it was improved to 2(O)(h(5)); and in 1999 Diestel, Gorbunov, Jensen, and Thomassen [3] proved a similar bound, with a much simpler proof. Here we show that f(h) = 2(O)(h log(h)) works. Since this paper was submitted for publication, Chekuri and Chuzhoy [2] have announced a proof that in fact f (h) can be taken to be O(h(100)). (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.format.extent38 - 53en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL THEORY SERIES Ben_US
dc.rightsAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.titleTree-width and planar minorsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1016/j.jctb.2014.09.003-
dc.date.eissued2014-10-07en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1096-0902-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
tree-width_and_planar.pdf149.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.