Skip to main content

Tidal modulation and back-propagating fronts in slow slip events simulated with a velocity-weakening to velocity-strengthening friction law

Author(s): Hawthorne, Jessica C; Rubin, Allan M

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1833mx9m
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHawthorne, Jessica C-
dc.contributor.authorRubin, Allan M-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-25T14:58:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-25T14:58:52Z-
dc.date.issued2013-02-22en_US
dc.identifier.citationHawthorne, Jessica C., and Allan M. Rubin. "Tidal modulation and back‐propagating fronts in slow slip events simulated with a velocity‐weakening to velocity‐strengthening friction law." Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 118, no. 3 (2013): 1216-1239. doi:10.1002/jgrb.50107.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2169-9313-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1833mx9m-
dc.description.abstract[1] We examine tidal modulation and back‐propagating fronts in simulated slow slip events using a rate and state friction law that is steady state velocity weakening at low slip rates and velocity strengthening at high slip rates. Tidal forcing causes a quasi‐sinusoidal modulation of the slip rate during the events, with the maximum moment rate occurring close to or slightly after the maximum applied stress. The amplitude of modulation scales linearly with the tidal load and increases as the tidal period increases relative to the timescale for state evolution. If we choose parameters so that the model matches the observed tidal modulation of slip in Cascadia, it can reproduce only a subset of the stress drops inferred from observations and only in a limited portion of parameter space. The tidal forcing also causes back‐propagating fronts to form and move back through the region that has already ruptured. The stress drop that drives these back‐propagating fronts sometimes comes from the tidal load and sometimes from a stress recovery that occurs behind the front in tidal and non‐tidal simulations. We investigate the slip and propagation rates in the back‐propagating fronts and compare them with observations. The modeled fronts propagate too slowly to be good representations of the fronts inferred from tremor observations. For the simulated fronts to propagate at the observed speeds, the stress drops driving them would have to be more than 70 % of the stress drop driving the forward‐propagating front.en_US
dc.format.extent1216 - 1239en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earthen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.en_US
dc.titleTidal modulation and back-propagating fronts in slow slip events simulated with a velocity-weakening to velocity-strengthening friction lawen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1002/jgrb.50107-
dc.identifier.eissn2169-9356-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tidal_modulation_back-propagating_fronts_slow_slip_events_simulated_velocity-weakening_velocity-strengthening_friction_law.pdf1.81 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.