Skip to main content
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr13816
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAustrian Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs (editor)en_US
dc.contributor.authorSalzburg Law School on International Criminal Law, Humanitarian Law, and Human Rights Law (editor)en_US
dc.contributor.authorTrauttmansdorff, Ferdinanden_US
dc.contributor.authorKirsch, Philippeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Ocampo, Luisen_US
dc.contributor.authorCathala, Brunoen_US
dc.contributor.authorTriffterer, Ottoen_US
dc.contributor.authorWenaweser, Christianen_US
dc.contributor.authorClark, Rogeren_US
dc.contributor.authorPrince Zeid Al-Husseinen_US
dc.contributor.authorFife, Rolfen_US
dc.contributor.authorVillacis, Renanen_US
dc.contributor.authorDanspeckgruber, Wolfgangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-07T13:08:06Z-
dc.date.available2012-05-07T13:08:06Z-
dc.date.issued2006-05en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01pv63g027t-
dc.description.abstractIn May 2006 the Austrian EU-Presidency, in cooperation with the Salzburg Law School on International Criminal Law organized an international conference on “The Future of the International Criminal Court.” The conference was seen as a timely starting point to discuss issues of importance for the 2009 Review Conference of the Rome Statute. Papers collected in the final report include analyses of the current practice of the court and its activities in the context of the strategic plan that should help in guiding the functioning of the court in the medium and long term; assessments of how the court may from past experience plan to address future challenges; comprehensive analyses of possibilities and perspectives to review the Rome Statute in order to improve its capacity to face present and future challenges, including ideas on specifying existing definitions contained in the Statute, on extending the number of crimes within the jurisdiction of the court, and on granting more procedural rights; and scenarios and options for the 2009 Review Conference and the role the Assembly of States Parties should play within the review process.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherLiechtenstein Institute on Self-Determinationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIssue Report;1en_US
dc.subjectInternational Criminal Court (ICC)en_US
dc.subjectAssembly of States Partiesen_US
dc.subjectRome Statuteen_US
dc.subjectOffice of the Prosecutoren_US
dc.subjectInternational Criminal Tribunalen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.subjectDemocratic Republic of the Congoen_US
dc.subjectDarfuren_US
dc.subjectYugoslaviaen_US
dc.subjectRwandaen_US
dc.titleThe Future of the International Criminal Courten_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
pu.projectgrantnumber286-2760en_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ICC_2006.pdf196.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.