Skip to main content

The most good you can do: a response to the commentaries

Author(s): Singer, P

To refer to this page use:
Abstract: Anthony Skelton, Violetta Igneski and Tracy Isaacs share my view that our obligations to help people in extreme poverty go beyond what is conventionally accepted. Nevertheless, the other contributors argue that my view is too demanding, while noting some tensions between my different writings on this issue. I explain my position, drawing on Sidgwick’s distinction between what someone ought to do, and what we should praise or blame someone for doing or not doing. I also respond to the position that Skelton considers preferable to mine, drawing this time on an argument that Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek and I have made in our recent book, The Point of View of the Universe. I also address Igneski’s concerns about gender inequality, and indicate my broad agreement with Isaacs’ suggestion that effective altruism could benefit from a more co-ordinated approach.
Publication Date: 2016
Citation: Singer, Peter. "The most good you can do: A response to the commentaries." Journal of Global Ethics 12, no. 2 (2016): 161-169.
DOI: doi:10.1080/17449626.2016.1191523
ISSN: 1744-9626
EISSN: 1744-9634
Pages: 161 - 169
Type of Material: Journal Article
Journal/Proceeding Title: Journal of Global Ethics
Version: Final published version. This is an open access article.

Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.