Skip to main content

Accidental symmetries and the conformal bootstrap

Author(s): Chester, Shai M; Giombi, Simone; Iliesiu, Luca V; Klebanov, Igor R; Pufu, Silviu S; et al

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1pw7c
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChester, Shai M-
dc.contributor.authorGiombi, Simone-
dc.contributor.authorIliesiu, Luca V-
dc.contributor.authorKlebanov, Igor R-
dc.contributor.authorPufu, Silviu S-
dc.contributor.authorYacoby, Ran-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-21T19:35:44Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-21T19:35:44Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationChester, Shai M, Giombi, Simone, Iliesiu, Luca V, Klebanov, Igor R, Pufu, Silviu S, Yacoby, Ran. (2016). Accidental symmetries and the conformal bootstrap. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 10.1007/JHEP01(2016)110en_US
dc.identifier.issn1029-8479-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1pw7c-
dc.description.abstractWe study an N = 2 supersymmetric generalization of the three-dimensional critical O(N) vector model that is described by N + 1 chiral superfields with superpotential W = g(1) X Sigma(i) Z(i)(2) + g(2)X(3). By combining the tools of the conformal bootstrap with results obtained through supersymmetric localization, we argue that this model exhibits a symmetry enhancement at the infrared superconformal fixed point due to g(2) flowing to zero. This example is special in that the existence of an infrared fixed point with g(1), g(2) not equal 0, which does not exhibit symmetry enhancement, does not generally lead to any obvious unitarity violations or other inconsistencies. We do show, however, that the F-theorem excludes the models with g(1), g(2) not equal 0 for N > 5. The conformal bootstrap provides a stronger constraint and excludes such models for N > 2. We provide evidence that the g(2) = 0 models, which have the enhanced O(N) x U(1) symmetry, come close to saturating the bootstrap bounds. We extend our analysis to fractional dimensions where we can motivate the nonexistence of the g(1), g(2) not equal 0 models by studying them perturbatively in the 4- epsilon expansion.en_US
dc.format.extent01(2016)110-1 - 01(2016)110-21en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICSen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. This is an open access article.en_US
dc.titleAccidental symmetries and the conformal bootstrapen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)110-
dc.date.eissued2016-01-19en_US
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10.1007_JHEP01(2016)110.pdf925.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.