Skip to main content

Anomalous Dynamics of QBO Disruptions Explained by 1D Theory with External Triggering

Author(s): Match, Aaron; Fueglistaler, Stephan

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1pc2t83s
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMatch, Aaron-
dc.contributor.authorFueglistaler, Stephan-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-25T15:02:12Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-25T15:02:12Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationMatch, Aaron, and Stephan Fueglistaler. "Anomalous Dynamics of QBO Disruptions Explained by 1D Theory with External Triggering." Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 78, no. 2 (2021): 373-383. doi:10.1175/JAS-D-20-0172.1.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-4928-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1pc2t83s-
dc.description.abstractThe quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) is an alternating, descending pattern of zonal winds in the tropical stratosphere with a period averaging 28 months. The QBO was disrupted in 2016, and arguably again in 2020, by the formation of an anomalous easterly shear zone, and unprecedented stagnation and ascent of shear zones aloft. Several mechanisms have been implicated in causing the 2016 disruption, most notably triggering by horizontal eddy momentum flux divergence, but also anomalous upwelling and wave stress. In this paper, the 1D theory of the QBO is used to show how seemingly disparate features of disruptions follow directly from the dynamics of the QBO response to triggering. The perturbed QBO is interpreted using a heuristic version of the 1D model, which establishes that 1) stagnation of shear zones aloft resulted from wave dissipation in the shear zone formed by the triggering, and 2) ascent of shear zones aloft resulted from climatological upwelling advecting the stagnant shear zones. Obstacles remain in the theory of triggering. In the 1D theory, the phasing of the triggering is key to determining the response, but the dependence on magnitude is less steep. Yet in MERRA-2, there are triggering events only 20% weaker than the 2016 triggering and equal to the 2020 triggering that did not lead to disruptions. Complicating matters further, MERRA-2 has record-large analysis tendencies during the 2016 disruption, reducing confidence in the resolved momentum budget.en_US
dc.format.extent373 - 383en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Atmospheric Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.en_US
dc.titleAnomalous Dynamics of QBO Disruptions Explained by 1D Theory with External Triggeringen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1175/JAS-D-20-0172.1-
dc.date.eissued2021-01-13en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1520-0469-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Anomalous_dynamics_QBO_disruptions_theory_external_triggering.pdf5.67 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.