Economic History or History of Economics? A Review Essay on Sylvia Nasar’s Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius
Author(s): Ashenfelter, Orley C.
DownloadTo refer to this page use:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1n72r
Abstract: | In this essay, I review Sylvia Nasar's long awaited new history of economics, Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius. I describe how the book is an economic history of the period 1850-1950, with distinguished economists' stories inserted in appropriate places. Nasar's goal is to show how economists work, but also to show that they are people too-with more than enough warts and foibles to show they are human! I contrast the general view of the role of economics in Grand Pursuit with Robert Heilbroner's remarkably different conception in The Worldly Philosophers: The Lives, Times, and Ideas of the Great Economic Thinkers. I also discuss more generally the question of why economists might be interested in their history at all. © 2012 AEA. |
Publication Date: | Mar-2012 |
Citation: | Ashenfelter, O. (2012). Economic History or History of Economics? A Review Essay on Sylvia Nasar’s Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius. Journal of Economic Literature, 50 (1), 96 - 102. doi:10.1257/jel.50.1.96 |
DOI: | doi:10.1257/jel.50.1.96 |
ISSN: | 0022-0515 |
Pages: | 96 - 102 |
Type of Material: | Journal Article |
Journal/Proceeding Title: | Journal of Economic Literature |
Version: | Final published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy. |
Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.