To refer to this page use:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1mj6g
Abstract: | We employ a discrete choice experiment in the employment process for a national call center to estimate the willingness to pay distribution for alternative work arrangements relative to traditional office positions. Most workers are not willing to pay for scheduling flexibility, though a tail of workers with high valuations allows for sizable compensating differentials. The average worker is willing to give up 20 percent of wages to avoid a schedule set by an employer on short notice, and 8 percent for the option to work from home. We also document that many job-seekers are inattentive, and we account for this in estimation. |
Publication Date: | Dec-2017 |
Citation: | Mas, A, Pallais, A. (2017). Valuing alternative work arrangements. American Economic Review, 107 (12), 3722 - 3759. doi:10.1257/aer.20161500 |
DOI: | doi:10.1257/aer.20161500 |
ISSN: | 0002-8282 |
Pages: | 1 - 39 |
Type of Material: | Journal Article |
Journal/Proceeding Title: | American Economic Review |
Version: | Final published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy. |
Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.