Skip to main content

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: “STROBE-RDS” statement

Author(s): White, Richard G; Hakim, Avi J; Salganik, Matthew J; Spiller, Michael W; Johnston, Lisa G; et al

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1g30p
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Richard G-
dc.contributor.authorHakim, Avi J-
dc.contributor.authorSalganik, Matthew J-
dc.contributor.authorSpiller, Michael W-
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Lisa G-
dc.contributor.authorKerr, Ligia-
dc.contributor.authorKendall, Carl-
dc.contributor.authorDrake, Amy-
dc.contributor.authorWilson, David-
dc.contributor.authorOrroth, Kate-
dc.contributor.authorEgger, Matthias-
dc.contributor.authorHladik, Wolfgang-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-17T14:14:36Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-17T14:14:36Z-
dc.date.issued2015-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationWhite, Richard G, Hakim, Avi J, Salganik, Matthew J, Spiller, Michael W, Johnston, Lisa G, Kerr, Ligia, Kendall, Carl, Drake, Amy, Wilson, David, Orroth, Kate, Egger, Matthias, Hladik, Wolfgang. "Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: “STROBE-RDS” statement" Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, (12), 68, 1463 - 1471, doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.002en_US
dc.identifier.issn0895-4356-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1g30p-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a new data collection methodology used to estimate characteristics of hard-to-reach groups, such as the HIV prevalence in drug users. Many national public health systems and international organizations rely on RDS data. However, RDS reporting quality and available reporting guidelines are inadequate. We carried out a systematic review of RDS studies and present Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for RDS Studies (STROBE-RDS), a checklist of essential items to present in RDS publications, justified by an explanation and elaboration document. Study Design and Setting: We searched the MEDLINE (1970e2013), EMBASE (1974e2013), and Global Health (1910e2013) databases to assess the number and geographical distribution of published RDS studies. STROBE-RDS was developed based on STROBE guidelines, following Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines. Results: RDS has been used in over 460 studies from 69 countries, including the USA (151 studies), China (70), and India (32). STROBE-RDS includes modifications to 12 of the 22 items on the STROBE checklist. The two key areas that required modification concerned the selection of participants and statistical analysis of the sample. Conclusion: STROBE-RDS seeks to enhance the transparency and utility of research using RDS. If widely adopted, STROBE-RDS should improve global infectious diseases public health decision makingen_US
dc.format.extent1463 - 1471en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Epidemiologyen_US
dc.rightsThis is the publisher’s version of the article (version of record). All rights reserved to the publisher. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.titleStrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: “STROBE-RDS” statementen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.002-
dc.date.eissued1-May-2015en_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
OAStrengthening.pdf451.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.