To refer to this page use:
|Abstract:||© 2015 by the Southern Political Science Association. All rights reserved. Retrospective voting models assume that offering more information to voters about their incumbents' performance strengthens electoral accountability. However, it is unclear whether incumbent corruption information translates into higher political participation and increased support for challengers. We provide experimental evidence that such information not only decreases incumbent party support in local elections in Mexico, but also decreases voter turnout and support for the challenger party, as well as erodes partisan attachments. While information clearly is necessary to improve accountability, corruption information is not sufficient because voters may respond to it by withdrawing from the political process. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of our findings for studies of voting behavior.|
|Citation:||Chong, A, De La O, AL, Karlan, D, Wantchekon, L. (2015). Does corruption information inspire the fight or quash the hope? A field experiment in Mexico on voter turnout, choice, and party identification. Journal of Politics, 77 (1), 55 - 71. doi:10.1086/678766|
|Pages:||1 - 17|
|Type of Material:||Journal Article|
|Journal/Proceeding Title:||Journal of Politics|
|Version:||Final published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.|
Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.