Skip to main content

Foraging for thought: an inhibition of return-like effect resulting from directing attention within working memory

Author(s): Johnson, Matthew R.; Higgins, Julie A.; Norman, Kenneth A.; Sederberg, Per B.; Smith, Troy A.; et al

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1775v
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Matthew R.-
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, Julie A.-
dc.contributor.authorNorman, Kenneth A.-
dc.contributor.authorSederberg, Per B.-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Troy A.-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Marcia K.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-28T15:53:59Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-28T15:53:59Z-
dc.date.issued2013-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, Matthew R, Higgins, Julie A, Norman, Kenneth A, Sederberg, Per B, Smith, Troy A, Johnson, Marcia K. (2013). Foraging for Thought. Psychological Science, 24 (7), 1104 - 1112. doi:10.1177/0956797612466414en_US
dc.identifier.issn0956-7976-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1775v-
dc.description.abstractProcessing of a target stimulus may be inhibited if its location has just been cued, a phenomenon of spatial attention known as inhibition of return (IOR). Here, we demonstrate a striking effect wherein items that have just been the focus of reflective attention (internal attention to an active representation) are also inhibited. Participants saw two items, followed by a cue to think back to (refresh, direct reflective attention toward) one item, and then had to identify either the refreshed item, the unrefreshed item, or a novel item. Responses were significantly slower for previously refreshed items than unrefreshed items, although refreshed items were better remembered on a later memory test. Control experiments replacing the refresh event with a second perceptual presentation did not show similar effects. These results suggest that reflective attention can produce an inhibition effect for attended items that may be analogous to IOR effects in perceptual attention.en_US
dc.format.extent1104 - 1112en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPsychological Scienceen_US
dc.rightsAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.titleForaging for thought: an inhibition of return-like effect resulting from directing attention within working memoryen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1177/0956797612466414-
dc.date.eissued2013-05-07en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1467-9280-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
nihms435495.pdf787.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.