Skip to main content

Contraceptive Failure in the United States: Estimates from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth

Author(s): Sundaram, A.; Vaughan, B.; Kost, K.; Bankole, A.; Finer, L.; et al

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1546f
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSundaram, A.-
dc.contributor.authorVaughan, B.-
dc.contributor.authorKost, K.-
dc.contributor.authorBankole, A.-
dc.contributor.authorFiner, L.-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, S.-
dc.contributor.authorTrussell, James-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-26T15:53:41Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-26T15:53:41Z-
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.citationSundaram, A, Vaughan, B, Kost, K, Bankole, A, Finer, L, Singh, S, Trussell, J. (2017). Contraceptive Failure in the United States: Estimates from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 49 (7 - 16). doi:10.1363/psrh.12017en_US
dc.identifier.issn1538-6341-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1546f-
dc.description.abstractCONTEXT: Contraceptive failure rates measure a woman's probability of becoming pregnant while using a contraceptive. Information about these rates enables couples to make informed contraceptive choices. Failure rates were last estimated for 2002, and social and economic changes that have occurred since then necessitate a reestimation. METHODS: To estimate failure rates for the most commonly used reversible methods in the United States, data from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth were used; some 15,728 contraceptive use intervals, contributed by 6,683 women, were analyzed. Data from the Guttmacher Institute's 2008 Abortion Patient Survey were used to adjust for abortion underreporting. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate the associated single-decrement probability of failure by duration of use. Failure rates were compared with those from 1995 and 2002. RESULTS: Long-acting reversible contraceptives (the IUD and the implant) had the lowest failure rates of all methods (1%), while condoms and withdrawal carried the highest probabilities of failure (13% and 20%, respectively). However, the failure rate for the condom had declined significantly since 1995 (from 18%), as had the failure rate for all hormonal methods combined (from 8% to 6%). The failure rate for all reversible methods combined declined from 12% in 2002 to 10% in 2006-2010. CONCLUSIONS: These broad-based declines in failure rates reverse a long-term pattern of minimal change. Future research should explore what lies behind these trends, as well as possibilities for further improvements.en_US
dc.format.extent7 - 16en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Healthen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy.en_US
dc.titleContraceptive Failure in the United States: Estimates from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growthen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1363/psrh.12017-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PSRH-49-7.pdf133.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.