Contraceptive Failure in the United States: Estimates from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth
Author(s): Sundaram, A.; Vaughan, B.; Kost, K.; Bankole, A.; Finer, L.; et al
DownloadTo refer to this page use:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1546f
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sundaram, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vaughan, B. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kost, K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bankole, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Finer, L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Singh, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Trussell, James | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-26T15:53:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-26T15:53:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Sundaram, A, Vaughan, B, Kost, K, Bankole, A, Finer, L, Singh, S, Trussell, J. (2017). Contraceptive Failure in the United States: Estimates from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 49 (7 - 16). doi:10.1363/psrh.12017 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1538-6341 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1546f | - |
dc.description.abstract | CONTEXT: Contraceptive failure rates measure a woman's probability of becoming pregnant while using a contraceptive. Information about these rates enables couples to make informed contraceptive choices. Failure rates were last estimated for 2002, and social and economic changes that have occurred since then necessitate a reestimation. METHODS: To estimate failure rates for the most commonly used reversible methods in the United States, data from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth were used; some 15,728 contraceptive use intervals, contributed by 6,683 women, were analyzed. Data from the Guttmacher Institute's 2008 Abortion Patient Survey were used to adjust for abortion underreporting. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate the associated single-decrement probability of failure by duration of use. Failure rates were compared with those from 1995 and 2002. RESULTS: Long-acting reversible contraceptives (the IUD and the implant) had the lowest failure rates of all methods (1%), while condoms and withdrawal carried the highest probabilities of failure (13% and 20%, respectively). However, the failure rate for the condom had declined significantly since 1995 (from 18%), as had the failure rate for all hormonal methods combined (from 8% to 6%). The failure rate for all reversible methods combined declined from 12% in 2002 to 10% in 2006-2010. CONCLUSIONS: These broad-based declines in failure rates reverse a long-term pattern of minimal change. Future research should explore what lies behind these trends, as well as possibilities for further improvements. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 7 - 16 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health | en_US |
dc.rights | Final published version. Article is made available in OAR by the publisher's permission or policy. | en_US |
dc.title | Contraceptive Failure in the United States: Estimates from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | doi:10.1363/psrh.12017 | - |
pu.type.symplectic | http://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-article | en_US |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PSRH-49-7.pdf | 133.07 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Download |
Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.