Skip to main content

Copper Intrauterine Device for Emergency Contraception: Clinical Practice Among Contraceptive Providers

Author(s): Harper, C.C.; Speidel, J.J.; Drey, E.A.; Trussell, James; Blum, M.; et al

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr13b46
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHarper, C.C.-
dc.contributor.authorSpeidel, J.J.-
dc.contributor.authorDrey, E.A.-
dc.contributor.authorTrussell, James-
dc.contributor.authorBlum, M.-
dc.contributor.authorDarney, P.D.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-26T15:53:34Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-26T15:53:34Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationHarper, CC, Speidel, JJ, Drey, EA, Trussell, J, Blum, M, Darney, PD. (2012). Copper Intrauterine Device for Emergency Contraception: Clinical Practice Among Contraceptive Providers. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 119 (220 - 226). doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182429e0den_US
dc.identifier.issn0029-7844-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr13b46-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The copper intrauterine device (IUD) is the most effective emergency contraceptive available but is largely ignored in clinical practice. We examined clinicians' recommendations of the copper IUD for emergency contraception in a setting with few cost obstacles. METHODS: We conducted a survey among clinicians (n=1,246; response rate 65%) in a California State family planning program, where U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptives are available at no cost to low-income women. We used multivariable logistic regression to measure the association of intrauterine contraceptive training and evidence-based knowledge with having recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception. RESULTS: The large majority of clinicians (85%) never recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception, and most (93%) required two or more visits for an IUD insertion. Multivariable analyses showed insertion skills were associated with having recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception, but the most significant factor was evidence-based knowledge of patient selection for IUD use. Clinicians who viewed a wide range of patients as IUD candidates were twice as likely to have recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception. Although more than 93% of obstetrician gynecologists were skilled in inserting the copper IUD, they were no more likely to have recommended it for emergency contraception than other physicians or advance practice clinicians. CONCLUSION: Recommendation of the copper IUD for emergency contraception is rare, despite its high efficacy and long-lasting contraceptive benefits. Recommendation would require clinic flow and scheduling adjustments to allow same-day IUD insertions. Patient-centered and high-quality care for emergency contraception should include a discussion of the most effective method. (Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:220-6) DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182429e0den_US
dc.format.extent220 - 226en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofObstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.rightsAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.titleCopper Intrauterine Device for Emergency Contraception: Clinical Practice Among Contraceptive Providersen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182429e0d-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
nihms345293.pdf295.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.