Memory Accessibility and Medical Decision-Making for Significant Others: The Role of Socially Shared Retrieval-Induced Forgetting
Author(s): Coman, Dora; Coman, Alin; Hirst, William
DownloadTo refer to this page use:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr10t84
Abstract: | Medical decisions will often entail a broad search for relevant information. No sources alone may offer a complete picture, and many may be selective in their presentation. This selectivity may induce forgetting for previously learned material, thereby adversely affecting medical decision-making. In the study phase of two experiments, participants learned information about a fictitious disease and advantages and disadvantages of four treatment options. In the subsequent practice phase, they read a pamphlet selectively presenting either relevant (Experiment 1) or irrelevant (Experiment 2) advantages or disadvantages. A final cued recall followed and, in Experiment 2, a decision as to the best treatment for a patient. Not only did reading the pamphlet induce forgetting for related and unmentioned information, the induced forgetting adversely affected decision-making. The research provides a cautionary note about the risks of searching through selectively presented information when making a medical decision. |
Publication Date: | 2013 |
Electronic Publication Date: | 2013 |
Citation: | Coman, Dora, Coman, Alin, Hirst, William. (2013). Memory Accessibility and Medical Decision-Making for Significant Others: The Role of Socially Shared Retrieval-Induced Forgetting. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 72:7. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00072 |
DOI: | doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00072 |
EISSN: | 1662-5153 |
Pages: | 1 - 9 |
Type of Material: | Journal Article |
Journal/Proceeding Title: | Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience |
Version: | Final published version. This is an open access article. |
Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.