Skip to main content

Memory Accessibility and Medical Decision-Making for Significant Others: The Role of Socially Shared Retrieval-Induced Forgetting

Author(s): Coman, Dora; Coman, Alin; Hirst, William

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr10t84
Abstract: Medical decisions will often entail a broad search for relevant information. No sources alone may offer a complete picture, and many may be selective in their presentation. This selectivity may induce forgetting for previously learned material, thereby adversely affecting medical decision-making. In the study phase of two experiments, participants learned information about a fictitious disease and advantages and disadvantages of four treatment options. In the subsequent practice phase, they read a pamphlet selectively presenting either relevant (Experiment 1) or irrelevant (Experiment 2) advantages or disadvantages. A final cued recall followed and, in Experiment 2, a decision as to the best treatment for a patient. Not only did reading the pamphlet induce forgetting for related and unmentioned information, the induced forgetting adversely affected decision-making. The research provides a cautionary note about the risks of searching through selectively presented information when making a medical decision.
Publication Date: 2013
Electronic Publication Date: 2013
Citation: Coman, Dora, Coman, Alin, Hirst, William. (2013). Memory Accessibility and Medical Decision-Making for Significant Others: The Role of Socially Shared Retrieval-Induced Forgetting. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 72:7. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00072
DOI: doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00072
EISSN: 1662-5153
Pages: 1 - 9
Type of Material: Journal Article
Journal/Proceeding Title: Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Version: Final published version. This is an open access article.



Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.