Skip to main content

Monkey vocal tracts are speech-ready

Author(s): Fitch, W. Tecumseh; de Boer, Bart; Mathur, Neil; Ghazanfar, Asif A.

Download
To refer to this page use: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr10f2g
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFitch, W. Tecumseh-
dc.contributor.authorde Boer, Bart-
dc.contributor.authorMathur, Neil-
dc.contributor.authorGhazanfar, Asif A.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-28T15:54:26Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-28T15:54:26Z-
dc.date.issued2016-12-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationFitch, WT, de Boer, B, Mathur, N, Ghazanfar, AA. (2016). Monkey vocal tracts are speech-ready. Science Advances, 2 (12), e1600723 - e1600723. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600723en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr10f2g-
dc.description.abstractDespite repeated attempts, no nonhuman primates have ever been trained to produce speech sounds, not even chimpanzees raised from birth in human homes (1). Humans appear to be the only primates with a capacity to flexibly control their vocalizations and to integrate respiration, phonation, and vocal tract movements in an intricate manner as required for speech (2–4). Since Darwin’s time, two hypotheses have been considered to be the likely explanations for this fact. The first “neural” hypothesis is that other primates lack the brain mechanisms required to control and coordinate their otherwise adequate vocal production system; Darwin favored this hypothesis, and it was widely accepted until the 1960s (5). The second “peripheral” hypothesis, in contrast, identifies the basis of primate vocal limitations as the anatomy and configuration of the nonhuman primate vocal tract. This hypothesis is widely accepted today, largely due to a seminal 1969 Science paper by Lieberman et al. (6), which used a computer program to explore the phonetic capability of a rhesus macaque and, by extension, other nonhuman primates. They concluded that “the vocal apparatus of the rhesus monkey is inherently incapable of producing the range of human speech” [(6), p. 1187]. Later work used the same methods and reached the same conclusions for chimpanzees (7), and thus inaugurated the reign of the “peripheral” hypothesis, which today remains a widely accepted “textbook fact” concerning human speech (8–13). For example, “early experiments to teach chimpanzees to communicate with their voices failed because of the insufficiencies of the animals’ vocal organs” (9). This now-traditional hypothesis has an important implication for the evolution of human language: that the broad phonetic range used in modern human speech required key changes in peripheral vocal anatomy during recent human evolution. Here, we present new data, based on x-ray images from living monkeys, that sharply challenge this hypothesis and thus its implication concerning language evolution.en_US
dc.format.extente1600723 - e1600723en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofScience Advancesen_US
dc.rightsFinal published version. This is an open access article.en_US
dc.titleMonkey vocal tracts are speech-readyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1126/sciadv.1600723-
dc.date.eissued2016-12-09en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2375-2548-
pu.type.symplectichttp://www.symplectic.co.uk/publications/atom-terms/1.0/journal-articleen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Monkey_vocal_tracts_2016.pdf1.13 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in OAR@Princeton are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.